Liberty News Forum - Political News Forum

Duncan_Pa LNF Moderator LNF Bunker Offline Doofus Posts: 4,240	Re: Simple math for simple liberals Reply #10 - Aug 4^th, 2009 at 1:43pm Running Deer wrote on Jul 30^th, 2009 at 8:46pm: Loser, Liar, or Pussy. Which one are you, precious? Watch it, Running Deer. You are free (note that) to advocate your opinions on disenfranchising unborn on this site but you are not free to act like that.
Back to top	IP Logged

Running Deer LNF Representative2 LNF Bunker Offline Disloyal Opposition Posts: 2,809 Gender:	Re: Simple math for simple liberals Reply #11 - Aug 5^th, 2009 at 10:17pm Calling for the summary execution of tens of millions of people: okay Calling that person a pussy: not okay Doesn't that strike you as an eensy bit twisted?
Back to top	"If cousins, I would much prefer to marry one my Neanderthal relatives than a screeching chimpanzee which might bite my face off as has happened recently. Of course, chimps are not even a human species so procreation between humans and chimps is out of the question." - joe_christian, on sex IP Logged

quiller

LNF Speaker
LNF Bunker

Offline

Reinstate dueling for
Congress

Posts: 21,948
michigan
Gender: male

Re: Simple math for simple liberals
Reply #12 - Aug 7^th, 2009 at 9:37pm

Running Deer wrote on Aug 5^th, 2009 at 10:17pm:

Calling for the summary execution of tens of millions of people: okay
Calling that person a pussy: not okay

Doesn't that strike you as an eensy bit twisted?

Doesn't it strike YOU that FIFTY MILLION is a figure so monstrous and huge that the death-dealing abortion-loving worthless filth who kill the helpless unborn just possibly might be dead wrong?

FIFTY MILLION. Far worse than the showah (Holocaust) during World War II. And the ignorant godless trash all assure us -- it isn't murder. As if their life means a damned thing if they would deny life to any other.

Back to top

IP Logged

Solar Rightwing Extremist

Ex Member

Re: Simple math for simple liberals
Reply #13 - Aug 7^th, 2009 at 9:54pm

Running Deer wrote on Jul 16^th, 2009 at 7:37pm:

Abortion isn't murder. Good job on missing the point of the thread, though.

So taking a life, an completely innocent life by the way, in your twisted mind isn't murder?

Murder: Kill intentionally and with premeditation.

That is the legal definition, but we all know that libs see it somehow as a woman's choice.
Just remember this when your wife or girlfriend executes your unborn son or daughter, and there is no way you can stop her.
Remember, it's her right to kill your prodigy.

Back to top

IP Logged

ccd2002

LNF Party Leader

Offline

Don't Retreat-RELOAD

Posts: 4,430

Re: Simple math for simple liberals
Reply #14 - Aug 8^th, 2009 at 12:15am

quiller wrote on Jul 13^th, 2009 at 12:35pm:

Abortion has murdered an estimated 49 to 50 million unborn U.S. taxpayers since Roe v Wade was illegally foisted on the individual states.

Dems think there's nothing wrong with wiping out that many tax dollars put back into Uncle Sugar's pockets. They're too busy swindling the survivors, instead.

Fifty million born would still mean a bare minimum of about 40 million who are able to work and pay taxes, not merely live on them.

Now then: define "short sighted Democrats."

Mark Chapter 9 verse 42

In the words of Jesus Christ.

Quote: "And whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me,it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck and he were cast into the sea."

Back to top

IF WE MEET AND YOU FORGET ME,YOU HAVE LOST NOTHING.
IF YOU MEET JESUS CHRIST AND YOU FORGET HIM,YOU HAVE LOST EVERYTHING.

IP Logged

quiller

LNF Speaker
LNF Bunker

Offline

Reinstate dueling for
Congress

Posts: 21,948
michigan
Gender: male

Re: Simple math for simple liberals
Reply #15 - Aug 8^th, 2009 at 1:06am

The egg is impregnated, and if you DO NOTHING to stop it, a human being is born --- in our case an American citizen with every right as anyone else. Leftists cannot tolerate the idea that infants while still IN the womb have those same protections. The liberals believe quite the opposite ---that an unborn American citizen may be slain in the name of personal convenience.

If it can be done to an unborn baby, it damn sure can be done to the adult who participates in that murder. At least it's the criminal and not the victim who would get what is manifestly due to them. Crush their skulls and suck out their brains --- there: tit for tat, justice is DONE.

It is amply clear we must GROW our tax base as quickly as possible, to offset this generation's anticipated high costs for elderly Americans. Liberals --- intent on punishing the victim and not the criminal who aborts them --- see nothing wrong at all with losing that huge amount of tax revenue.

edit for grammar

Back to top

« Last Edit: Aug 8^th, 2009 at 10:45am by quiller »

IP Logged

Running Deer

LNF Representative2
LNF Bunker

Offline

Disloyal Opposition

Posts: 2,809
Gender: male

Re: Simple math for simple liberals
Reply #16 - Aug 9^th, 2009 at 9:23pm

Quote:

So taking a life, an completely innocent life by the way, in your twisted mind isn't murder?

Murder: Kill intentionally and with premeditation.

Oh, does that include American soldiers bombing weddings? No? Then your definition is going to need some work. Brush up and start again.

Of course, the point of the thread is why liberals don't oppose abortion on lost tax revenue grounds. I answered that in my first response, which is that "maximum tax revenue" is not the chief liberal value.

Back to top

"If cousins, I would much prefer to marry one my Neanderthal relatives than a screeching chimpanzee which might bite my face off as has happened recently. Of course, chimps are not even a human species so procreation between humans and chimps is out of the question." - joe_christian, on sex

IP Logged

quiller

LNF Speaker
LNF Bunker

Offline

Reinstate dueling for
Congress

Posts: 21,948
michigan
Gender: male

Re: Simple math for simple liberals
Reply #17 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 9:29am

Running Deer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2009 at 9:23pm:

Oh, does that include American soldiers bombing weddings? No? Then your definition is going to need some work. Brush up and start again.

Of course, the point of the thread is why liberals don't oppose abortion on lost tax revenue grounds. I answered that in my first response, which is that "maximum tax revenue" is not the chief liberal value.

Then obviously the first liberal priority is to allow premeditated murder on CONVENIENCE grounds, not tax revenues. Liberals CAN put a price on human life --- as long as they deny it's human, until the baby is born.

Back to top

IP Logged

Solar Rightwing Extremist

Ex Member

Re: Simple math for simple liberals
Reply #18 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 10:55am

Running Deer wrote on Aug 9^th, 2009 at 9:23pm:

Oh, does that include American soldiers bombing weddings? No? Then your definition is going to need some work. Brush up and start again.

Of course, the point of the thread is why liberals don't oppose abortion on lost tax revenue grounds. I answered that in my first response, which is that "maximum tax revenue" is not the chief liberal value.

If you are going to build a straw man, you really should use straw, a pile of manure doesn't do a very good job of representing a straw man, also it tends to stink.
However, in typical liberal form, you use Bush as a distraction against the real issue of murdering babies.
Why is it you can't accept the fact of taking a life, still constitutes killing, and by any other definition, is still murder.
I wonder, if your dog had a litter of puppies, could you bring yourself to kill them because no one else wanted them, and you didn't want the responsibility of caring for them?
After all, isn't that the purpose behind abortion, no one wants them or the responsibility to care for them?

Now what if someone wanted those puppies, would you let them have them, rather than kill them?
Well, there is a long waiting list to adopt new born children, so where is your rationale for murdering...
Oh, I'm so sorry, you don't believe it's murder, so lets call it what it is, killing!
So how can you justify that?

Back to top

IP Logged

Lady_Marva

Ex Member

Re: Simple math for simple liberals
Reply #19 - Aug 10^th, 2009 at 2:26pm

quiller wrote on Aug 8^th, 2009 at 1:06am:

The egg is impregnated, and if you DO NOTHING to stop it, a human being is born

Not necessarily.
First of all, that impregnated egg has to attach to the uterine wall.

FYI: One-third of all pregnancies end in miscarriage. So at best your "Do Nothing" does not necessarily result in a human being born, but rather only one-third will be.

Back to top

IP Logged