Liberty News Forum - Political News Forum

Uyr Ex Member	Re: Children On Farms Regulated By Feds! Reply #110 - Mar 17^th, 2012 at 7:40pm Self-radicalizing Harry wrote on Mar 17^th, 2012 at 5:48pm: Yeah, 30 million since 74 is a very small percentage... Still making it a numbers-game. What was that acceptable number of deaths again , Harry?
Back to top	IP Logged

starsnstripes

Ex Member

Re: Children On Farms Regulated By Feds!
Reply #111 - Mar 18^th, 2012 at 1:45am

Writers_Block wrote on Mar 17^th, 2012 at 6:38pm:

Slaves are given the minimal amount of food
Children eat the profits of the bounty

Slaves wear rags for clothes
Children are given decent clothes to wear

Slaves have no education
Children go to school and even college

Slaves sleep in the barest of conditions
Children sleep in warm beds

Slaves suffer blows from a whip
Children are loved by their families

You're right. Not much of a difference. Or maybe that's how you treat your children, then your analogy makes sense.

You're making very good points. Uyr has a habit of distorting facts to the point of parodied mockeries.

Back to top

IP Logged

Self-radicalizing Harry LNF Speaker LNF Bunker Offline I used to be Bert, but something went terribly wro Posts: 19,573 Gender:	Re: Children On Farms Regulated By Feds! Reply #112 - Mar 18^th, 2012 at 1:46am Quote: Still making it a numbers-game. What was that acceptable number of deaths again , Harry? You ask for numbers, and claim I make it a numbers game?
Back to top	Give me ambiguity, or give me something else. IP Logged

starsnstripes Ex Member	Re: Children On Farms Regulated By Feds! Reply #113 - Mar 18^th, 2012 at 1:47am Quote: Still making it a numbers-game. What was that acceptable number of deaths again , Harry? You're being ridiculous. The only people that never die in accidents are the ones who stay in bed all day. Perhaps it's what you'd like children to do.
Back to top	IP Logged

starsnstripes Ex Member	Re: Children On Farms Regulated By Feds! Reply #114 - Mar 18^th, 2012 at 1:49am Self-radicalizing Harry wrote on Mar 18^th, 2012 at 1:46am: You ask for numbers, and claim I make it a numbers game? I noticed that too. He's being incoherent.
Back to top	IP Logged

starsnstripes Ex Member	Re: Children On Farms Regulated By Feds! Reply #115 - Mar 18^th, 2012 at 1:53am People die while going on vacation with their children in their cars. Perhaps we should outlaw vacations too.
Back to top	IP Logged

SiouxRebel

LNF Speaker
LNF Bunker

Offline

Explaining the Foundations
of America

Posts: 10,266
Central Oregon
Gender: male

Re: Children On Farms Regulated By Feds!
Reply #116 - Mar 18^th, 2012 at 1:59am

Self-radicalizing Harry wrote on Mar 18^th, 2012 at 1:46am:

You ask for numbers, and claim I make it a numbers game?

Actually it was cc that mentioned numbers saying that only 188 children died due to farm accidents. So, and to any logical way of thinking, since one thinks the new rules, or are they old rules, are an incursion on parental rights the natural question would be just how many is an acceptable number? If the 188 given is not acceptable, would it then be 288, somewhere in between, greater then?

It is a question you, nor anyone else, wants to answer.

Back to top

1Samuel 8: 19,20
"Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king over us; That we also may be like all the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles."

IP Logged

Writers_Block

LNF Speaker
LNF Bunker

Offline

Posts: 18,344
Florida
Gender: male

Re: Children On Farms Regulated By Feds!
Reply #117 - Mar 18^th, 2012 at 2:11am

SiouxRebel wrote on Mar 18^th, 2012 at 1:59am:

Actually it was cc that mentioned numbers saying that only 188 children died due to farm accidents. So, and to any logical way of thinking, since one thinks the new rules, or are they old rules, are an incursion on parental rights the natural question would be just how many is an acceptable number? If the 188 given is not acceptable, would it then be 288, somewhere in between, greater then?

It is a question you, nor anyone else, wants to answer.

Wrong question. The question is, do you want the government intrusion in your life? If you don't want it in other areas, why would you want it concerning your children in a family setting?

Back to top

IP Logged

starsnstripes

Ex Member

Re: Children On Farms Regulated By Feds!
Reply #118 - Mar 18^th, 2012 at 9:52am

Writers_Block wrote on Mar 18^th, 2012 at 2:11am:

Wrong question. The question is, do you want the government intrusion in your life? If you don't want it in other areas, why would you want it concerning your children in a family setting?

The extreme left are the only ones who beg for more intrusion of the government in their lives and that's only because they are chronic free-loaders.

Back to top

IP Logged

SiouxRebel

LNF Speaker
LNF Bunker

Offline

Explaining the Foundations
of America

Posts: 10,266
Central Oregon
Gender: male

Re: Children On Farms Regulated By Feds!
Reply #119 - Mar 18^th, 2012 at 10:41am

Writers_Block wrote on Mar 18^th, 2012 at 2:11am:

Wrong question. The question is, do you want the government intrusion in your life? If you don't want it in other areas, why would you want it concerning your children in a family setting?

Setting aside the obvious ignorance of people like Harry, and "StarsnStripes", did the people want that government intrusing when labor laws were first established in 1938? Are you now saying that Childrens Protective Services should be done away with, and children be allowed to be abused by uncaring parents?

There is a balance to be met, and government agencies often go astray. Does that then mean we ave no need of some government agency to protect childen? We have the rules to protect adults, why not children?

And the question of how many children need to die is relevant, and you show why it is even more relevant when you seem to have no concern over their well being.

Back to top

1Samuel 8: 19,20
"Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king over us; That we also may be like all the nations; and that our king may judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles."

IP Logged