Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Liberty News Forum
 
 
Home Help Search Login Register



Liberty News Forum
Political Discussion News Forum - Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. Not for wimps!
Political Opinion Page - Recent Posts - LNF Forums
Christian Forum - Religion Forum - Creative Writing - Sports Forum
A1 News Page - Games - Computers Tech - Military - Financial News - Bunker - Presidential Tracking Poll
Directory of LNF Blogs - Rasmussen Reports Polls - House - Off the Wall News - Page 2 - Chat Room
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Question 1 For Atheists (Read 1,180 times)
Sandy
LNF Party Leader
***
Offline


I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 4,604
Right here
Gender: male
Re: Question 1 For Atheists
Reply #30 - Jun 25th, 2012 at 10:28am
 
joe_christian wrote on Jun 25th, 2012 at 9:45am:
Ok, but you have just posted observable evidence to substantiate our mutual claim that we believe exactly what we "want to believe, and naught else." You choose to believe all of the above because you are convinced

Becoming convinced of something is not necessarily a process of faith. It can also be a process dominated by weight of evidence, a very different thing, and one which dispenses with a need for faith.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
joe_christian
LNF Speaker
*****
Offline


Religious Rights

Posts: 27,973
Gender: male
Re: Question 1 For Atheists
Reply #31 - Jun 25th, 2012 at 11:09am
 
Sandy wrote on Jun 25th, 2012 at 10:28am:
Becoming convinced of something is not necessarily a process of faith.

Faith is a process? If so, would that not necessitate "faith" in the process?  Roll Eyes

Quote:
It can also be a process dominated by weight of evidence, a very different thing, and one which dispenses with a need for faith.

The process of becoming convinced of something necessitates not only faith in one's convictions but faith in the fact that all of the evidence has been presented and justifies one's conclusions about the "evidence."

Without faith in the presumed predictability of a repeatable scientific experiment or demonstration, what scientist would dare risk or stake his reputation on it? Even a magician has faith in his audience's inability to distinguish illusion from reality. So must the evolutionist also have faith in his reader's inability to distinguish illusion from reality.

Now, tell us why your belief in evolution is not a deluded fantasy originally fabricated by Darwin and explain how some sort of subhuman ape-like creatures in Africa were able to "evolve" into the first black African men and women on earth, if you are able to.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 25th, 2012 at 11:17am by joe_christian »  
 
IP Logged
 
joe_christian
LNF Speaker
*****
Offline


Religious Rights

Posts: 27,973
Gender: male
Re: Question 1 For Atheists
Reply #32 - Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:00am
 
Since no one seems able to explain how and when humans and human consciousness come into existence it should be safe to assume that God created the earth, sun, moon, stars and all living things on earth, including humans, in six days and rested on the seventh, the Sabbath Day.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sandy
LNF Party Leader
***
Offline


I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 4,604
Right here
Gender: male
Re: Question 1 For Atheists
Reply #33 - Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:08am
 
joe_christian wrote on Jun 25th, 2012 at 11:09am:
Faith is a process? If so, would that not necessitate "faith" in the process?  Roll Eyes

Faith is a leap in the dark, with you unable to see if there's a landing point. That you happen to find one doesn't justify another leap of faith: that reasoning is the foundation of the Gambler's Fallacy. Because faith has nothing to do with reasoning (except as post priori rationalization) it is an irrational process: you begin with your conclusion, the seek evidence justifying it, keeping only what does, throwing the rest away. Building up a case by evidence is a deliberately rational process, beginning with a question and deliberately examining all the available evidence to see whether an agreeing conclusion is merited.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
Sandy
LNF Party Leader
***
Offline


I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 4,604
Right here
Gender: male
Re: Question 1 For Atheists
Reply #34 - Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:16am
 
joe_christian wrote on Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:00am:
Since no one seems able to explain how and when humans and human consciousness come into existence it should be safe to assume that God created the earth, sun, moon, stars and all living things on earth, including humans, in six days and rested on the seventh, the Sabbath Day.

This  ^^^  is the way insane people "reason." One may as well say, and with every bit as much validity, "since no one seems able to explain how and when humans and human consciousness come into existence it should be safe to assume that the great god Mnhweidfsigbkl, shat the world into existence 50 billion years ago, then, having finally created it, and seeing it was good, went out for coffee and never came back." The insane person believes if another remains silent or says, "I don't know," then that suffices as "positive evidence" supporting whatever view the insane person champions.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
Jack Fate
LNF Representative2
***
Offline


I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 2,732
Re: Question 1 For Atheists
Reply #35 - Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:19am
 
Sandy wrote on Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:16am:
This  ^^^  is the way insane people "reason." One may as well say, and with every bit as much validity, "since no one seems able to explain how and when humans and human consciousness come into existence it should be safe to assume that the great god Mnhweidfsigbkl, shat the world into existence 50 billion years ago, then, having finally created it, and seeing it was good, went out for coffee and never came back." The insane person believes if another remains silent or says, "I don't know," then that suffices as "positive evidence" supporting whatever view the insane person champions.


Does this sick crap pass for intelligence where you come from?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
joe_christian
LNF Speaker
*****
Offline


Religious Rights

Posts: 27,973
Gender: male
Re: Question 1 For Atheists
Reply #36 - Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:38am
 
Sandy wrote on Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:08am:
Faith is a leap in the dark, with you unable to see if there's a landing point. {/quote]
You just justified my lack of faith in your claim about faith. 

[quote]That you happen to find one doesn't justify another leap of faith: that reasoning is the foundation of the Gambler's Fallacy.

Yet you have faith that "reasoning is the foundation of the Gambler's Fallacy" after just stating that "faith is a leap in the dark!"  Grin

Quote:
Because faith has nothing to do with reasoning (except as post priori rationalization) it is an irrational process:

So it would be irrational of me to either believe or have faith in what you just wrote!  Grin

Quote:
you begin with your conclusion, the seek evidence justifying it, keeping only what does, throwing the rest away.

That's precisely what Darwinists like you do. God willing, you will finally realize and admit it.

Quote:
Building up a case by evidence is a deliberately rational process, beginning with a question and deliberately examining all the available evidence to see whether an agreeing conclusion is merited.

Agreed. What evidence is available to both of us whereby we may see what conclusion about the question of evolution is merited?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sandy
LNF Party Leader
***
Offline


I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 4,604
Right here
Gender: male
Re: Question 1 For Atheists
Reply #37 - Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:57am
 
Jack Fate wrote on Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:19am:
Does this sick crap pass for intelligence where you come from?

Can you make a cogent argument against what I said? Please, try. Defend the lunatic, if you can.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
Jack Fate
LNF Representative2
***
Offline


I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 2,732
Re: Question 1 For Atheists
Reply #38 - Jul 5th, 2012 at 11:02am
 
Sandy wrote on Jul 5th, 2012 at 10:57am:
Can you make a cogent argument against what I said? Please, try. Defend the lunatic, if you can.


There is no arguing against mental illness.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sandy
LNF Party Leader
***
Offline


I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 4,604
Right here
Gender: male
Re: Question 1 For Atheists
Reply #39 - Jul 5th, 2012 at 11:17am
 
Jack Fate wrote on Jul 5th, 2012 at 11:02am:
There is no arguing against mental illness.

Tucking tail again, I see. You do that very well. Well, bye-bye.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
(Moderators: admin, Seawolf, PoliMod, moderator, Mercy For All)

Conservative Blog Advertising
LNF Blogs
A1 News Page
All News Polls
Capitalist Chronicle
Political Frog
Poor Wally's Almanac
Obamanation
LNF Yomo
David Limbaugh
Obama countdown clock
National debt clock
Unemployment Rates
U.S. Budget Deficits
Inflation rate
Misery Index
LNF Books
Conservatives Directory




LNF Home - Political Opinion Page
LNF Forums

Poll Vote for President
Opinion on Abortion - Christian Forum - Religion Forum - Sports Forum - Entertainment - Games - House
Library and references - Constitutional Rights - History Forum - Military - Cooking and Crafts - Creative Writing
Video Games - Off the Wall News - Science Forum - Tech Gadgets - Financial News - Home Repair - Humor
Bunker - Page 2 - Page 3 - Page 4 - Chat Room





Drudge Report - News Max - Rush Limbaugh - FrontpageMag
Advertise on the LNF - Magazines Discounts - Twitter LNF - LNF Archive - LNF News
LNF Blog
News and Political Links
Political Blogs
Add your website or blog
Political Columnists
Political Humor
News forum posting, privacy policy and member rules