Liberty News Forum
Political News Forum - Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. Not for wimps!
Political Opinion Page - Recent Posts - LNF Forums LNF in the Age of Empowerment! Algorithm free!
Christian Forum - Religion Forum - Entertainment - Sports Forum
Military - A1 News Page - Computers Tech - Financial News - Bunker - Presidential Tracking Poll
The House - Off the Wall News - Page 2 - Rasmussen Reports Polls - Chat Room
Liberty News ForumLNF Forums HerePolitical Opinion Page - The Hot Seat › High chair for the high court...
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) High chair for the high court... (Read 687 times)
Freon_Bale
LNF Representative
***
Online

Courage is fearing something,
then doing it anyway

Posts: 1,419
Joined: Feb 16th, 2017
Re: High chair for the high court...
Reply #50 - Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:18pm
Print Post  
Lomelis wrote on Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:06pm:
And most rational people believe that she is probably lying.

She provided absolutely no evidence.  Every "witness" has no idea what she is talking about.  She provided no dates.  She has provided nothing.

Except that she conveniently came forward over 35 years later right before her supposed assaulter, who has had no such allegations prior to this, was nominated setting leftists into a straight panic.

Literally panicking.

She's lying.  You know the whole accusation is a sham, you know there is no possible way to investigate her accusations with what she has provided.  You simply hoped that the mere accusations alone would sink him or at least delay the vote until after the midterms.


So you are coming from a place where you only see your point of view as rational.

That is convenient.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Freon_Bale
LNF Representative
***
Online

Courage is fearing something,
then doing it anyway

Posts: 1,419
Joined: Feb 16th, 2017
Re: High chair for the high court...
Reply #51 - Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:18pm
Print Post  
Rabbit_Reborn wrote on Oct 9th, 2018 at 1:50pm:
Get your s**t together.


Rabbit, I'm surprised at you. Taking me out of context?

I think you are just playing, now.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Freon_Bale
LNF Representative
***
Online

Courage is fearing something,
then doing it anyway

Posts: 1,419
Joined: Feb 16th, 2017
Re: High chair for the high court...
Reply #52 - Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:20pm
Print Post  
AmericanMom wrote on Oct 9th, 2018 at 1:45pm:
No actually I wouldnt..

If there is no proof, no supporting evidence (not even a hint of a cover up) then we must treat him as the law would..
Innocent.

I fail to understand why that concept is so hard for the so called liberals on this forum.


I get the concept, I am just not convinced he's innocent.

If you are, great, but if you are wrong, then even you have to agree that a sexual predator would be a bad appointment to the SCOTUS.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AmericanMom
LNF Representative3
LNF Bunker
***
Offline

I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 3,845
Location: Oregon
Joined: Jul 4th, 2012
Gender: Female
Re: High chair for the high court...
Reply #53 - Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:26pm
Print Post  
Freon_Bale wrote on Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:20pm:
I get the concept, I am just not convinced he's innocent.

If you are, great, but if you are wrong, then even you have to agree that a sexual predator would be a bad appointment to the SCOTUS.



Once again, you go on the what if's while I go on the facts.
You aren't convinced he is innocent because you don't want him on the court.
Yes, it is as plain as that.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Freon_Bale
LNF Representative
***
Online

Courage is fearing something,
then doing it anyway

Posts: 1,419
Joined: Feb 16th, 2017
Re: High chair for the high court...
Reply #54 - Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:31pm
Print Post  
AmericanMom wrote on Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:26pm:
Once again, you go on the what if's while I go on the facts.
You aren't convinced he is innocent because you don't want him on the court.
Yes, it is as plain as that.
 


I expected a conservative on the court, so to say I do not want HIM, I agree, it is Kavanaugh I do not want.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
AmericanMom
LNF Representative3
LNF Bunker
***
Offline

I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 3,845
Location: Oregon
Joined: Jul 4th, 2012
Gender: Female
Re: High chair for the high court...
Reply #55 - Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:32pm
Print Post  
Freon_Bale wrote on Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:31pm:
I expected a conservative on the court, so to say I do not want HIM, I agree, it is Kavanaugh I do not want.



by any means possible..

  Move on... He is seated and now we look to when Ginsburg will step down
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Freon_Bale
LNF Representative
***
Online

Courage is fearing something,
then doing it anyway

Posts: 1,419
Joined: Feb 16th, 2017
Re: High chair for the high court...
Reply #56 - Oct 9th, 2018 at 3:02pm
Print Post  
AmericanMom wrote on Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:32pm:
by any means possible..

  Move on... He is seated and now we look to when Ginsburg will step down


To me, you are describing yourself.

Let me ask you this. Would a purely conservative judiciary be your preference? What I am asking is if you feel the whole country (which is mostly liberal) should be represented, or just a majority of the minority (conservatives)?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Lomelis
LNF Speaker
*****
Online

Wonderboy

Posts: 15,184
Location: California
Joined: Dec 20th, 2002
Gender: Male
Re: High chair for the high court...
Reply #57 - Oct 9th, 2018 at 3:06pm
Print Post  
Freon_Bale wrote on Oct 9th, 2018 at 2:18pm:
So you are coming from a place where you only see your point of view as rational.

That is convenient.


Of course it is.

You have yet to provide any reasonable argument that should be taken serious.

No evidence, no proof, no witnesses, no dates, nothing.  Yet you want to assume a 50/50 chance that she is telling the truth.

There is nothing rational about that.

If I accuse you of being a 500 lb woman with a beard with no proof, no evidence, absolutely nothing to back it up the rational person is going to assume that I'm making shit up.  There is no 50/50 chance that I'm telling the truth.  There is the very very very slim chance that I got lucky but even I the accuser would know that most likely I was way off the mark.

Your 50/50 argument is pure partisan garbage, it is irrational and unreasonable.
  

Ignorant Blessings from Wads:

Wadsworth wrote on Jul 2nd, 2018 at 4:13pm:
Watched it.  A shotgun is for long ranged shooting.  That is why hunters like them.  An AR-15 is not.  That video was misleading.

Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Freon_Bale
LNF Representative
***
Online

Courage is fearing something,
then doing it anyway

Posts: 1,419
Joined: Feb 16th, 2017
Re: High chair for the high court...
Reply #58 - Oct 9th, 2018 at 3:16pm
Print Post  
Lomelis wrote on Oct 9th, 2018 at 3:06pm:
Of course it is.

You have yet to provide any reasonable argument that should be taken serious.

No evidence, no proof, no witnesses, no dates, nothing.  Yet you want to assume a 50/50 chance that she is telling the truth.

There is nothing rational about that.

If I accuse you of being a 500 lb woman with a beard with no proof, no evidence, absolutely nothing to back it up the rational person is going to assume that I'm making shit up.  There is no 50/50 chance that I'm telling the truth.  There is the very very very slim chance that I got lucky but even I the accuser would know that most likely I was way off the mark.

Your 50/50 argument is pure partisan garbage, it is irrational and unreasonable.


Fine. Do a full investigation. I think a SCOTUS position is important enough to warrant that. Why don't you?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Rabbit_Reborn
LNF Speaker
LNF Bunker
*****
Offline

2015 Poster of the Year.
Election stolen 2016.

Posts: 23,776
Location: Midwest
Joined: Oct 17th, 2005
Re: High chair for the high court...
Reply #59 - Oct 9th, 2018 at 3:25pm
Print Post  
Freon_Bale wrote on Oct 9th, 2018 at 3:16pm:
Fine. Do a full investigation. I think a SCOTUS position is important enough to warrant that. Why don't you?

There is nothing to investigate.

What evidence could possibly be found?

What can they investigate?

They have sworn statements from the people that the accuser says were the only possible witnesses, and none of them recall any of this occurring.

No date. No location. Almost 40 years ago.

How would you lay out an investigation into this? What would be the first step? Asking people the same questions they've already been asked and sworn to?

Really think this through. What would a detective do? Pull out a magnifying glass and go where exactly? Re-interview everybody and find inconsistencies?

Any inconsistencies might be chalked up to the fact that it was 40 f***ing years ago.

This is why statute of limitations exist. I understand this isn't a criminal investigation, but the same principles apply.

I can't believe I'm still typing this out, for the 1,000th time.
  

Wadsworth wrote on Jun 11th, 2018 at 3:40pm:
You are awfully concerned about who gets to live.  Why is it so important to you?
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 
Send TopicPrint
 
Liberty News ForumLNF Forums HerePolitical Opinion Page - The Hot Seat › High chair for the high court...

LNF Home - Political Opinion Page
LNF Forums

Christian Forum - Religion Forum - Sports Forum - Entertainment - House
Military, History - Cooking and Crafts - Creative Writing
Off the Wall News - Science Forum - Tech Gadgets - Financial News - Humor
Bunker - Page 2 - Page 3 - Page 4 - Chat Room





Drudge Report - News Max - Rush Limbaugh - FrontpageMag
Advertise on the LNF - Twitter LNF - LNF Archive - LNF News
LNF Blog
News and Political Links
Political Blogs
Add your website or blog
Political Columnists
Political Humor
A1 News Page
David Limbaugh
Political Frog
Conservatives Directory
President Trump Approval Poll
Presidential Party Election Poll News forum posting, privacy policy and member rules