Liberty News Forum
Political News Forum - Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. Not for wimps!
Political Opinion Page - Recent Posts - LNF Forums LNF in the Age of Empowerment! Algorithm free!
Christian Forum - Religion Forum - Entertainment - Sports Forum
Military - A1 News Page - Computers Tech - Financial News - Bunker - Presidential Tracking Poll
The House - Off the Wall News - Page 2 - Rasmussen Reports Polls - Chat Room
Liberty News ForumLNF Forums HerePolitical Opinion Page - The Hot Seat › Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’ (Read 67 times)
AmericanMom
LNF Representative3
LNF Bunker
***
Offline

I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 3,845
Location: Oregon
Joined: Jul 4th, 2012
Gender: Female
Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’
Oct 8th, 2018 at 7:56am
Print Post  
Now that Justice Kavanaugh will be seated, lets get back to Russia, Russia Russia and the whole collusion thing shall we..

  Its coming apart at the seams and what many of us have said from the get go is proving to be a reality. There was no Russia collusion with Trump. Get ready, the Document dumps are coming Smiley

Then, last Wednesday, I broke the story that Baker admitted to Congress in an unclassified setting — repeat, in an unclassified setting — that he had met with a top lawyer at the firm representing the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and received allegations from that lawyer about Russia, Trump and possible hacking.

It was the same DNC, along with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, that funded the unverified, salacious dossier by a British intel operative, Christopher Steele, that became a central piece of evidence used to justify the FBI surveillance of the Trump campaign in the final days of the election.

And it was the same law firm that made the payments for the dossier research so those could be disguised in campaign spending reports to avoid the disclosure of the actual beneficiaries of the research, which were Clinton and the DNC.

And it was, in turns out, the same meeting that was so heavily censored by the intel agencies from Footnote 43 in the House report — treated, in other words, as some big national security secret.

What makes this so extraordinary is that the FBI and the DOJ would have Americans believe that a contact with a lawyer for a political party during the middle of the election is somehow a matter of national security that should be hidden from the public.

Well, that argument was proven to be a lie by the very way the interview with Baker played out last Wednesday on Capitol Hill. Baker was not interviewed in a "SCIF" — a "sensitive compartmented information facility" routinely used to discuss super-secret, highly sensitive information. There was no claim of classification over any information he provided Congress that day.

So we can now say with some authority that the earlier redaction in Footnote 43 was done in the name of a national security concern that did not exist.


https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/410287-fbis-smoking-gun-redactions-prote...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Waking in a Wally Wonderland
Hardhat
Conservative Caucus
*****
Offline

Cunning... is but the
low mimic of wisdom ~Plato

Posts: 22,919
Location: Upstate New York
Joined: Feb 24th, 2008
Gender: Male
Re: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’
Reply #1 - Oct 8th, 2018 at 8:08am
Print Post  
The expression WHY NOW? come to mind....

Could it have anything to do with the pending release of the declassified  materials that will out Baker (the chief Counsel for the FBI) and the corrupt abuse of power against a political campaign favor of the candidate they attempted to install, regardless of the will of the American people.

There is a storm a'coming and neither rain or sleet or even hail will keep these Traitors out of jail!

Who will get the deal first and rat out the other conspirators? Baker?
  

" The few will always act like the few.�

�Machiavelli

Back to top
WWWAIM  
IP Logged
 
AmericanMom
LNF Representative3
LNF Bunker
***
Offline

I Love Liberty News Forum!

Posts: 3,845
Location: Oregon
Joined: Jul 4th, 2012
Gender: Female
Re: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’
Reply #2 - Oct 8th, 2018 at 8:14am
Print Post  
Waking in a Wally Wonderland wrote on Oct 8th, 2018 at 8:08am:
The expression WHY NOW? come to mind....

Could it have anything to do with the pending release of the declassified  materials that will out Baker (the chief Counsel for the FBI) and the corrupt abuse of power against a political campaign favor of the candidate they attempted to install, regardless of the will of the American people.

There is a storm a'coming and neither rain or sleet or even hail will keep these Traitors out of jail!

Who will get the deal first and rat out the other conspirators? Baker?


More than likely Baker will get the deal... 

Rollin along!


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Waking in a Wally Wonderland
Hardhat
Conservative Caucus
*****
Offline

Cunning... is but the
low mimic of wisdom ~Plato

Posts: 22,919
Location: Upstate New York
Joined: Feb 24th, 2008
Gender: Male
Re: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’
Reply #3 - Oct 8th, 2018 at 8:53am
Print Post  
AmericanMom wrote on Oct 8th, 2018 at 8:14am:
More than likely Baker will get the deal... 

Rollin along!



Will Baker be the John Dean who turns on the Obama Administration's conspirators and blows them all in; INCLUDING the former President his own damn self?  What did Obama know and when did he know it?  Was it an Obama operation from the start?  Is he still using his Blackberry to coordinate the coup?  Who else is in on it?  Hillary? Bill? Soros? Members of Congress?


Counsel to President Nixon, John W. Dean III became famous as the first White House official to accuse the president of direct involvement in the Watergate ...  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/watergate/dean.html

BTW, you would think that Woodward & Bernstein would like to get ahead of this story (unless they themselves are implicated in the cover up)
  

" The few will always act like the few.�

�Machiavelli

Back to top
WWWAIM  
IP Logged
 
Ulysses
LNF House Leader
LNF Bunker
****
Online

REDACTED

Posts: 9,786
Location: The Lodestar
Joined: Feb 19th, 2018
Re: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’
Reply #4 - Oct 11th, 2018 at 5:26pm
Print Post  
Toad's solution for the redaction problem is not to let anybody see the documents in the first place.

After all, he went into office screaming, "Crappity smack the law!"

  

When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross, and wearing road kill as a toupée
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Waking in a Wally Wonderland
Hardhat
Conservative Caucus
*****
Offline

Cunning... is but the
low mimic of wisdom ~Plato

Posts: 22,919
Location: Upstate New York
Joined: Feb 24th, 2008
Gender: Male
Re: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’
Reply #5 - Oct 11th, 2018 at 5:28pm
Print Post  
Hey it's October!  Wait a couple of weeks (for maximum impact) the Surprise!  Pop goes the Weasels!  Grin
  

" The few will always act like the few.�

�Machiavelli

Back to top
WWWAIM  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint
 
Liberty News ForumLNF Forums HerePolitical Opinion Page - The Hot Seat › Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’

LNF Home - Political Opinion Page
LNF Forums

Christian Forum - Religion Forum - Sports Forum - Entertainment - House
Military, History - Cooking and Crafts - Creative Writing
Off the Wall News - Science Forum - Tech Gadgets - Financial News - Humor
Bunker - Page 2 - Page 3 - Page 4 - Chat Room





Drudge Report - News Max - Rush Limbaugh - FrontpageMag
Advertise on the LNF - Twitter LNF - LNF Archive - LNF News
LNF Blog
News and Political Links
Political Blogs
Add your website or blog
Political Columnists
Political Humor
A1 News Page
David Limbaugh
Political Frog
Conservatives Directory
President Trump Approval Poll
Presidential Party Election Poll News forum posting, privacy policy and member rules