Public Opinion

“Listen to the people”—that would be a better title to this discourse. History has shown that it takes time for some people in power to learn that lesson. King Louis XVI of France lost his head over the idea. The following demonstrates that Alexander Hamilton had an easier time of it.

  1. “I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value.” – Alexander Hamilton – in a letter to George Washington – 1794
  2. “It is on great occasions only, and after time has been given for cool and deliberate reflection, that the real voice of the people can be known.” – George Washington – May 1, 1796
  3. “The first thing in all great operations of such a government as ours is to secure the opinion of the people.” – Alexander Hamilton – February 2, 1799

Obviously it took five years for Hamilton to come to his senses, regarding the value of public opinion. Two significant ideas can be reaped from the writings of these two founding fathers.  

  1. The first is Hamilton’s change of heart in a period of five years. In 1799, the phrase “to secure the opinion of the people” means to find out how they feel about a certain proposal. This did not mean to stuff an idea down their throats. It took him five years to learn this lesson.
  2. The second is Washington’s recognition of the need that “time has been given for cool and deliberate reflection”. He valued the “real voice of the people”, as well as the time it takes to deliberate.

This is true today, as it was then. Sadly, many leaders in Washington DC feel that boisterous townhall meetings, teeming with angry Americans, consider them “Astroturf” or a “mad mob”. In the first place, “Astroturf” is something you step on. Our founding fathers adopted a motto about that, in our dispute with Great Britain—“don’t tread on me”. “Don’t tread on me” was relevant then and even more appropriate now. This “mad mob” has been maligned and accused of being employed by the “vast right-wing conspiracy” or “wealthy lobbyists”. To set the record straight, the only people paid to attend a townhall meeting are those from ACORN, who are paid to disrupt and silence the American majority.

Furthermore, I would ask, “What is the rush?” The attitude that things must be done within a certain deadline is pure folly and makes me question the real motives of those in a rush. Whatever the topic, be it healthcare, stimulus et al, we should be more deliberate, giving time for the people to determine what is “good” or “right”. Not only should we ask if our legislators have read a proposal, but also, “Who wrote the darn thing?” The answers are mystifying and they change every day.

I commend those legislators who had the courage to meet with the people, many of them angry, to listen to them in the light of day. To those elected officials who were too cowardly to convene a townhall meeting, I tell you to fear the people on election day. Alexander Hamilton saw the light; it is time you did the same.

6 Responses to “Public Opinion”

  1. Zeke Says:

    Federalist, I think you’re misinterpreting those quotes. First, Hamilton believed that all governments were based on the opinion and consent of the people. This is a view which Hamilton held as far back as 1787 during the Constitutional Convention Debates (June 18th), where he noted one of the supports of government was an habitual attachment of the people, which correlates to quote #3 in your post and precedes your quote #1 (thereby distorting the proposed evolution in opinion). Second, that public opinion can be molded by opinion makers. There is no evolution from quote #1 to quote #3; if you don’t have great faith in popular opinion, you attempt to shape it as Hamilton did on many occasions, including the Federalist Papers.

  2. admin Says:

    Hi Zeke.
    I guess it depends on what historian writes the biography. I met a lecturer who spoke in the persona of Hamilton; it was his opinion that Hamilton got sidetracked with the national bank idea, but eventually realized the people have something to say about it.
    Regardless, the issue today is that my congressman voiced the idea that the folks who criticize his pro-Obamacare stance are not representative of real people. This man refuses to listen…but he is also dating Pelosi’s daughter.
    Thanks for reading the blog.

  3. Zeke Says:

    “it was his opinion that Hamilton got sidetracked with the national bank idea, but eventually realized the people have something to say about it.”

    Hmmm… I’m wondering what he meant by that.

  4. admin Says:

    That’s probably half the problem in congress: What do people really mean when they say certain things?

  5. storage stockport Says:

    Took me ages to find this post, this time I’ll bookmark it.

  6. Storage Disley Says:

    Certainly got us thinking here are work, expect a few replies later.

Leave a Reply