I found quite funny the part where he orders that all mentions of Moses be erased from any written document in Egypt. That's the oldest paranoid trick in the world.
It's not there because they deliberately ERASED IT!!!
It appears that you are suggesting that the "non-record" of Jews in Egypt is a "paranoid trick." Judaism is a belief in the Torah and its attendant traditions. It remains that way today. However, as much as we Jews like to rely on historical precedent, Judaism is not science nor archeology. It's a religion. There will never be any scientific "proof" of Judaism.
That being said - yes the pharaohs did put quite a lot of time in erasing some of their predecessors whom they found objectionable. Look up Akhenaten. Look up the "Sea Peoples." Look up the Hittite invasion. Oddly enough, all of these historical incidences were around the times of the supposed Jewish settlements in Egypt. (Which, by the way, according to the Torah, the Egyptians objected to and therefore enslaved the Jews because there could be no peace between Jews and Egyptians as long as they continued settling on land that was not theirs... )
Who doesn't know this? The hard part for the woman is making sure the man always thinks he's smarter.
I grew up reading Robert Heinlein, one of the great science fiction writers. This was always a key principle in most of his writing.
Smarts is also a relative term. Most women tend to be a least 27% spiritually smarter in that they understand far more intuitively what the "right" thing to do is than do men. I suspect the Swiss did not factor this into their equations...
It will stop a terrorist from getting a job. Amazing. I guess the war on terrorism is over then.
Its primarily directed at the many thousands of illegals that are employed here currently from south of the border and any folks that desire to come here to work in the future. If they knew they had to have the National Work card in order to get hired they simply wouldn't sneak north to do so knowing they couldn't qualify.
I just threw the terrorist aspect in beings they wish to sneak into our country also, but the work card is aimed at the illegal Latino's from south of the border down Mexico way ~ Olay
So then you don't believe that if an American breaks the law in a foreign country he's subject to the penalties of law of that country?
So explain to me you congenital idiot why that same dictator can later on be arrested, judged, and executed for what you don't call murders in the first place. How does that fit with your "legal" definition of what constitute a murder?
Nice try at saving face loser but this article doesn't validate the words I just listed. So since, you don't get the cigar you'll just have to smoke the one of your dear friend Q who incidentally decided to use you as a decoy to chicken out of the debate "sub rosa" so to speak.
Time for you to acknowledge, my young padawan learner: You are in the presence of Grandmaster.
An article in Wikipedia doesn't mean squat moron. Some of them are written by unemployed leeches like you (I have fistfuls of PMs about you) who see it as a means of flattering their oversized ego.
There's a new Swiss research report now out, on finding the way to a happy marriage. My wife says, "Sounds pretty female-friendly to ME!"
~~~~
Inside, Swiss researchers report the discovery of a magic formula for successful marriages. If true, this could mean that marriages of the future will be contracted based on scientific principles, instead of such common, but notoriously unreliable factors as failed prophylactics and tequila.
The study begins by echoing what many of us have known all along: that a successful marriage has little to do with passion, sexual prowess, your partner's good looks, or the make and model of his car. It has to do with smarts.
According to these well meaning, but obviously over-funded scientists, the key to a happy marriage -- if you are a man -- is to find a woman who is 27 percent smarter than you are. If you are a woman, you need to find a man 27 percent dumber.
Don't be misled because it's presently aimed at just the p*rno crowd. It establishes some dangerous precedents for law enforcement to use against average citizens. Story is from the Electronic Freedom Frontier site, strong privacy advocates.
===
Adult Photography Record-Keeping and Inspection Law Threatens Free Speech, Privacy EFF Supports Challenge to Overbroad Statute That Chills Online Expression
San Francisco - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed a friend-of-the-court brief today urging a federal court judge to block two criminal statutes that unconstitutionally limit the free expression of millions of adults who use the Internet and other electronic forms of communication, bringing the threat of criminal sanctions for private, lawful speech.
At issue are provisions of federal law that require anyone who produces a visual depiction of sexually explicit expression to maintain extensive records -- including copies of drivers' licenses, the dates and times images were taken, and all URLs where images were posted -- and often force public disclosure of a creator's home address. Even more troubling, the regulations allow law enforcement warrantless entry into homes or offices in order to inspect the records that are supposed to be kept. While these statutes regulate the commercial pornography industry, they also likely apply to a staggering number of Americans who create and share images of themselves over social networks, online dating services, personal erotic websites, and text messaging.
Besides which, evidence does exist for Jesus Christ. You never specified what kind of evidence you're looking for.
Anything at all - you can chose your own mode of proof. And not just for Jesus but any figure in the Gospels being substantiated by the Gospel's descriptions. My point is that the Christian belief is genuine and equal to all belief systems, as belief per se is a generic factor inherent in all life - and is seen everywhere, before and after Christianity, and even in atheists. But historically, all of the Gospels in its entirety is fictional - as in a Shakespear play. Everything in it tells me this is a Roman-Greek document having no connection with Jews.
They're nuts if they do this. They're nuts already but doing something this, as Levin compared it to Martial law because there really wouldn't BE a law passed, would unleash a hell storm on D.C.